Automation Skill Builder
All posts Home

Product blog · Decision

ASB vs classic RPA vs AI desktop agents

A practical three-way comparison so you can pick the right harness — and know when Automation Skill Builder is the wrong fit.

One-paragraph summary

Classic RPA platforms optimize durable enterprise bots, orchestration, and control-room governance. Many AI desktop agents optimize sandboxed or cloud-hosted “computer use.” Automation Skill Builder (ASB) optimizes local-first capture → deterministic host-native skills, with optional MCP so Cursor/VS Code can call those skills — without requiring Hyper-V or a cloud operator for runtime execution.

Comparison table

Dimension Classic RPA AI desktop agents ASB
Primary strength Governance, scale, certified bots Open-ended computer use / planning Fast local skill packaging + MCP reuse
Runtime AI Usually none for scripted bots Often model-in-the-loop each run AI for authoring; deterministic skill runs
Host model Robots / VDI / attended-unattended VM sandbox or cloud operator common Host-native local control plane
Hyper-V / VM prerequisite Depends on vendor design Often required for local sandboxes Not mandatory to start
Assistant integration Vendor connectors / APIs Built into the agent product Optional local MCP tools
Best when Enterprise CoE, audit-heavy fleets Exploratory tasks that stay dynamic Repeatable desktop/API flows you own

When ASB fits

When you should not use ASB

Specs travel. A fine-grained process spec can later be re-consumed in ASB or mapped to RPA primitives — see Spec-Driven. Positioning vs VM-first agents: product positioning.
Download ASB Cursor MCP recipe